Points Of View

Points of View Aeschylus faces off with Euripides in a dramatic parcel out and is decl ared the victor. The decision is one of cosmetics more(prenominal) than substance. Aeschylus wrote plays that appealed to the race of Athens. The Oresteia is a story with noticeable characters faced with difficult decisions in which rightness prevails. On the other hand, Euripides wrote plays that were more realistic, such as The Electra, which reveals the helplessness of custody and women. That both authors wrote plays dealing with the same story helps us to see the light the differences in their sound judgements and styles. The Oresteia credibly was favoured more by the Athenian people because of some key situationors. One of these is character portrayal. Aeschylus make his heroes strong minded and dependable of resolve, whereas Euripides tended to show his characters shortcomings. An example of this is the character of Orestes. In The Libation Bearers, Orestes comes upon the pict ure and makes himself cognise to his babe immediately and right away(predicate) reveals his plot to kill their tiros murderers. He is in control of the attendant and prepared to kill both his mother and her lover: Our surliness who is never starved for blood shall drink/ for the third pickup a cupful of unwatered blood (Libation Bearers, Lines 577-578). Orestes would contribute appealed to the Athenian hu humanitys because of his strength and his desire to avenge the murder of his make and physical contact the oracle of Apollo. In The Electra, Euripides creates a genuinely(prenominal) different propensity for Orestes than does Aeschylus. Orestes does not burst onto the scene and immediately make himself cognise to his sister. He actu accessory does not volitioningly reveal himself. It is not until his grey-haired tutor comes and recognises him that he admits to Electra that he is her brother. This moldiness(prenominal) have distressed an Athenian auditory sense to see the son of Agamemnon secrecy h! is indistinguishability from his sister for quite a long folder of dialogue. When his indistinguishability is know, it must have been in truth disheartening to see the causality Greek leaders son being so indecisive. Orestes cannot wait to hypothecate or act for himself: Whom shall I make/ my ally? Shall I act by night or by day? What path shall I/ take against my foes? (Electra, Lines 599-601). Oresetes weak will shows itself again when he sees his mother coming and cries out: Orestes: persuade! We must revise our plan./ Electra: What is it? Do you see reinforcements from Mycenae?/ Orestes: No, but the mother, the char that gave me/ stand (Electra, Lines 963-967). Orestes reluctantly slays his mother only after a long deal of pushing by his anxious sister. This scene is very different from Aeschylus, where Orestes needs no such spurring from his sister to avenge their fathers murder. Electra is another character that probably did not pass on Euripides all votes fr om his audience. In The Oresteia, Electra lives in the same dwelling rest home as her mother and holds the shocking position of a kings inadequate girl regular though her father is dead. In Euripedes interpretation of the story, Electra was consider out from the royal house, marries a fry, and is dressed in the rags of poverty. Also, she complains forever and a day about her low status. both by means ofout the beginning pages she tells the audience of her woes, raising questions as to her motives for having her brother return and her mother killed. This is close obvious in the conversation with her brother, his identity still concealed, in which she must cover out of her grievous fortunes to Orestes. Interestingly, the murder of her father ranks behind the take of her clothes, the hovel in which she lives, the work she must do (even though the man she marries offered to do it all for her), the particular that she can not affableize at the holy festivals, and the fact that her mother is queen. These selfish complai! nts are very different from the Electra of The Oresteia who speaks of her father first and also of the powers of Force, and Right,/ and genus Zeus almighty (The Libation Bearers, Lines 244-245). A secondment area in which Aeschylus probably won the favour of the judge is the remainder scenes of Clytemnestra and Aegisthus and the events follo learng their deaths. In The Oresteia, Orestes confronts both Clytemnestra and Aegisthus individually and kills them. Then, in The Eumenides, the play is devoted to decision making whether the matricide committed by Orestes is justified. The annunciation of this play is the recognition of the Furies as justice of an older time, and genus Athene compensates them their rightful place in modern justice. Euripides treats the deaths of Clytemnestra and Aegisthus very differently. First, Euripides gives a detailed description of the death of Aegisthus, which at the time was not a popular amour with the audience. The way Orestes stabbed Aegist hus in the concealment probably did not win any point from the judge either. Then, after Orestes slays his mother, the mood is very different from that of The Oresteia.

Orestes and Electra both get that what they did was not justified even by the oracle of Apollo and mourning their actions. This is quite different from the sturdy Orestes of The Oresteia. Euripides even dares to blame it on Apollo: Castor: Clever he is, but what he required of/ you was not clever (Electra, Lines 1243-1244). The ending of the play is very rude and does not give lots detail about the futurity for Orestes or Electra. The play leaves the indorser questioning if justice truly was served. Aeschylus wo uld win the contest in Athens because Athenians would! call for to position more with his play. Aeschylus provides for the audience a play of heroic actions, grand characters, and the development of justice, which is a very pleasing image for Athenians. Euripides, on the other hand, questions the nobility of riches and the actions of his heroic characters. Also, Euripides writes some daring, less-traveled things in his plays, such as the scene in The trojan Women when Athena asks Poseidon to help her visit the Greeks by causing a giant storm on their voyage home. I think Euripides is repair suited to assuage Athens from moral end because of the underlying values in his plays. In The Electra, Euripides uses the character of the grouch to show that wealth does not mean strength of character. The peasant shows that even a suffering man can be noble and honourable, and in my opinion is more honourable than any of the other characters who are considered noble because of their royal lineage. Euripides plays contain more realism than Aeschylus plays, and I desire they give better acumen into the moral problems of the common man than does a play that has characters that appear more mythical than real. The truth can sometimes be ugly, and Euripides tries to convey reality in its raw form through his plays. He also helps to give insights on some remedies for complaisant problems. The Trojan Women is a secure example of how Euripides shows the audience the dark of war through the eyeball of Hecuba, coming at a time when Athens is preparing a military campaign in Syracuse. Euripides focuses on moral and social issues far more than Aeschylus does and that is why he would be better suited to save Athens. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay